Item Illustration : Tax Game
Tax

Tax Game

In the 17th edition of our "Tax Game", we compared the personal income tax systems of various member countries using a real-life case scenario from 2024. The aim was to highlight the differences in tax calculation methods and levels of taxation, offering a practical and engaging way to explore the specific features of each national tax system.

Share this article

Tax

Tax Game

In the 17th edition of our "Tax Game", we compared the personal income tax systems of various member countries using a real-life case scenario from 2024. The aim was to highlight the differences in tax calculation methods and levels of taxation, offering a practical and engaging way to explore the specific features of each national tax system.

Share this article

To illustrate the exercise, we first present the German model in detail, followed by a comparative table showcasing selected responses from our member firms.

 

Germany (Example)

 
Husband  
He is a co-owner of a small business and has from it  
Income from business operations  30.000
He is self-employed as an architect and earns  
Income from self-employment 110.000
   
Wife  
She works as an accountant and has  
Income from employment 40.000
Her father had left her a rented house, from which she has  
Rental Income 15.000
In 2024, she took part in a guessing game on television,  
because she was so good, she won € 5.000  
Other income 5.000
   
Capital Gains, Interest and dividend - income  
   
Husband  
Interest and dividends 9.000
Wife  
Interest and dividends 3.000
Sale of shares 9.000  

 

There is a total income amount 2024 for both of € 221.000.

 

They both paid for their own health insurance, whereby he for a private insurance € 7.400 p.a. and she for a statutory insurance € 3.530 p.a. for her work as an employee.

 

They paid €7.000 to a craftsman company for a new terrace in their home.

 

Comparative Overview – Selected Countries

 

Taxable income

 

Tax

 

In % from

taxable income

In % from

total income

Austria

201.438

 

65.901

 

32,7%

29,8%

China

189.560

 

39.555

 

20,9%

17,9%

Cyprus

190.142

 

43.539

 

22,9%

19,7%

France

193.000

 

43.835

 

22,7%

19,8%

Germany

205.340

 

58.152

 

28,3%

26,3%

Japan

200.140

 

44.891

 

22,4%

20,3%

Lebanon

207.000

 

28.280

 

13,7%

12,8%

Malta

192.000

 

49.800

 

25,9%

22,5%

Netherlands

175.470

 

66.287

 

37,8%

30,0%

Panama

182.125

 

42.065

 

23,1%

19,0%

Poland

   

37.616

   

17,0%

Portugal

213.500

 

72.587

 

34,0%

32,8%

United-Kingdom

203.930

 

63.643

 

31,2%

28,8%

             

 

The different taxable income amount comes from tax exemptions or tax advantages, which are granted in several countries such as standard allowances on different types of income, discounts or flat rate deductions.

 

In many countries, in addition to the normal tax rate, separate lower tax rates are applied to various types of income (e.g. rental income).

Capital income is taxed at a special, usually lower, tax rate in all countries.

 

In summary, it can be said that statements about high or low tax rates alone do not provide any indication of the actual tax burden in a country. For example, countries with a high tax rate may well have comparatively low tax burdens if the sum of the types of income is reduced by exemptions from taxation to such an extent that taxable income is low.

 

It should also be noted that in some countries the social security components are only determined with the tax assessment. In some countries, high social security contributions are assessed in addition to taxes. In the example above, Poland has a comparatively low tax burden, but an extraordinarily high social security contribution is also assessed with the tax assessment.

 

It might be interesting to include the burden of social security contributions in a next step.

 

Hans Ronneberger 

Rentrop & Partner - Germany